RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-02523
XXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
The Fitness Assessments (FA), dated 04 Jun 12, 23 Aug 12, and 30 May 13 be declared void and removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS).
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He had a medical condition with his heart, known as Wolff Parkinson White Syndrome, which prevented him from obtaining a passing score on the contested FAs. Furthermore, in December 2012 he had a heart ablation procedure to correct the condition, but was not given sufficient time for fitness reconditioning, which resulted in another FA failure on 30 May 13.
In support of his appeal, the applicant submits a Medical Determination Letter, signed by his medical provider and indicating he had a condition that precluded him from passing the FAs dated 4 Jun 12 and 23 Aug 12 and a commander invalidation memorandum, requesting that the FA dated 30 May 13 be removed.
The applicants complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
At the time the application was submitted the applicant had not exhausted all available avenues of administrative relief prior to seeking correction of military records.
Air Force Instruction (AFI) 36-2905, Fitness Program, dated
21 Oct 13, states that any military member can appeal his or her own FA through a Wing-Level Appeals Board and through the AFPC Fitness Assessment Appeals Board (FAAB), within two years of discovering the error or injustice.
In accordance with AFI 36-2905, if an Airman becomes injured or ill during the FA and is unable to complete all required components, he or she will have the option of being evaluated at the Medical Treatment Facility (MTF). However, the test will still count unless rendered invalid by the Unit Commander within five days of the assessment. If the medical evaluation validates the illness or injury, the Unit Commander may invalidate the test results. The Airman will then be required to retest within five duty days or when capable based on the recommendations of the medical provider and the Exercise Physiologist (EP).
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial of the applicants request for the removal of the contested FAs due to the applicant not exhausting all administrative remedies. The applicant contends that he had an ongoing medical condition which prevented him from passing his FAs administered on 4 Jun 12, 23 Aug 12, and 30 May 13 and therefore, requests removal. However, in this case, the applicant's DD Form 149 was signed after 21 Oct 13 (signed on 18 Apr 14) and the appeal has not been considered by his Wing Commander, nor has it been reviewed by the FAAB; thus, the applicant's request has not been submitted per current Air Force guidance.
A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSIM evaluation is at Exhibit B.
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation, was forwarded to the applicant on 25 Aug 14 for review and comment within 30 days. As of this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit C).
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has not exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. In this respect, we note this Board is the highest administrative level of appeal within the Air Force and once a final decision has been rendered the applicant will no longer be able to avail himself of the existing subordinate levels of administrative review. As such, an applicant must first exhaust all available avenues of administrative relief provided by existing law or regulations prior to seeking relief before this Board, as required by the governing Air Force Instruction. The Air Force office of primary responsibility has reviewed this application and indicated there is an available avenue of administrative relief the applicant has not first pursued. The applicant should therefore be advised that the Board is returning this portion of his application without action. Furthermore, the Board cannot grant reconsideration on this portion of his request unless and until he has exhausted all other avenues of relief. Therefore, in view of the above, we find no compelling basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this application.
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that he has not exhausted all available avenues of administrative relief prior to submitting his application to the BCMR; and the application will only be reconsidered upon exhausting all subordinate avenues of administrative relief.
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2014-02523 in Executive Session on 17 Dec 14, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
XXXXXXXXXX, Panel Chair
XXXXXXXXXX, Member
XXXXXXXXXX, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 18 Apr 14, w/atch.
Exhibit B. Letter, AFPC/DPSIM, dated 30 Jun 14.
Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 25 Aug 14.
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02012
In support of his appeal, the applicant submits a Medical Determination Letter, signed by his medical provider, which stated that, he had a documented medical condition that precluded him from achieving a passing score in a non-exempt portion of the FA test. The applicants complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. Air Force Instruction (AFI) 36-2905, Fitness Program, dated 21 Oct 2013, states that any military member can appeal his or her own FA through a Wing-Level...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01677
Examiners Note: In his application the member states that he submits a memorandum from his medical provider and a letter from his commander. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial of the applicants request for the removal of the contested FA due to the applicant not exhausting all administrative remedies. Furthermore, the Board cannot grant reconsideration on this portion of his request unless and until he has exhausted all other avenues of relief.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05435
As of this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit C). As such, an applicant must first exhaust all available avenues of administrative relief provided by existing law or regulations prior to seeking relief before this Board, as required by the governing Air Force Instruction. In view of this and since this avenue of administrative relief was available at the time the applicant submitted his application, we find it would be inappropriate to consider this application for...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00709
AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial of the applicants request for the removal of the contested FA due to the applicant not exhausting all administrative remedies. In this respect, this Board is the highest administrative level of appeal within the Air Force. Exhibit B. DD Form 149, dated 24 Mar 14, w/atchs.
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00787
Air Force Instruction (AFI) 36-2905, Fitness Program, dated 21 Oct 13, states that any military member can appeal his or her own FA through a Wing-Level Appeals Board and through the AFPC Fitness Assessment Appeals Board (FAAB), within two years of discovering the error or injustice. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial of the applicants request for the removal of the contested FAs due to the applicant not exhausting all administrative remedies. As such, an applicant must...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05139
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05139 COUNSEL: NONE XXXXXXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Fitness Assessment (FA), dated 15 Aug 13 be declared void and removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01997
AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial of the applicants request for the removal of the contested FAs due to the applicant not exhausting all administrative remedies. As such, an applicant must first exhaust all available avenues of administrative relief provided by existing law or regulations prior to seeking relief before this Board, as required by the governing Air Force Instruction. Furthermore, the Board cannot grant reconsideration on this portion of his request unless...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05484
________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial of the applicants request for void/removal of FA dated 30 Jun 10. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSIM evaluation is at Exhibit B. Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 20 Feb 14.
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01091
Air Force Instruction (AFI) 36-2905, Fitness Program, dated 21 Oct 2013, states that any military member can appeal his or her own FA through a Wing-Level Appeals Board and through the AFPC Fitness Assessment Appeals Board (FAAB), within two years of discovering the error or injustice. As such, an applicant must first exhaust all available avenues of administrative relief provided by existing law or regulations prior to seeking relief before this Board, as required by the governing Air...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03423
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial indicating the applicant has not exhausted all available avenues of administrative relief prior to seeking correction of his military records. In this respect, we note this Board is the highest administrative level of appeal within the Air Force. ...